(Courtesy Photo By: Benjamin Simpson
(Courtesy Photo By: Benjamin Simpson)

The District paid Oscar award winning alum Dustin Lance Black more than $26,000 so he would not sue the school after top officials rescinded an invitation for him to speak at commencement last May, according to a settlement agreement.

Former school president Mark Rocha signed the settlement agreement that paid Black $26,050 to settle “each and every claim, demand, and cause of action by black” in addition to a $3,000 honorarium on May 8. Black signed it on May 12, three days after he delivered his commencement speech.

Black had hinted at “legal ramifications” in a letter he sent to the Courier last May after school officials disinvited him from commencement when they discovered he had been the victim of “revenge porn.”

Interim President Robert Miller and Board President Anthony Fellow declined to comment on when the district decided to settle with Black or when the Board of Trustees approved the settlement. They each sent the same exact response when contacted by the Courier.

“The issue with Mr. Black has been resolved and the district has no further comment at this time,” Miller and Fellow each wrote in emails.

In the settlement, Black agreed to not disclose the settlement through “oral statements, written statements, emails, Twitter, blogs, Facebook, Tumblr, etc.” Neville Kiser, Black’s assistant, did not return an email requesting comment on this story.

Academic Senate President Eduardo Cairo said that it was appalling that the board paid out that much taxpayer money to cover up a mistake it had made.

“There was no transparency during this process,” Cairo said. “If you have a roach in your house, you probably have others. So if this problem was there, I’m sure there are other problems that we are just not aware of yet. It’s a total lack of transparency.”

The school had initially decided against selecting the Oscar winning screenwriter because they feared sexually explicit photos of Black that surfaced on the Internet in 2009 would tarnish the school’s reputation.

The photos had been leaked from a sex video that Black’s former boyfriend had stolen from him. Black won a lawsuit against the website that had released the photos.

Rocha later called Black and apologized for the college’s mishandling of the situation, according to a press release put out by the school in May.

“The Board of Trustees and college administration deeply respect Mr. Black, his work and his causes,” the release stated. “The Board also sincerely apologizes to Mr. Black for any actions that may have caused hurt.”

Black won an Oscar for best screenplay in 2008 for the film “Milk.”

3 Replies to “Oscar winning alum’s settlement unveiled”

  1. Dustin Lance Black represents the worst of the whiney “me” generation: irresponsible, immature, and greedy. For him to accept a settlement from Pasadena City College because he was disinvited and then reinvited to speak reeks of disingenuity;

    Only an actor with a drowning career would take money from taxpayers like a scam artist involved in a “slip and fall” at the grocery store.

    I wish someone would hack the security video at his bank and post pictures of his cashing that check from the taxpayers of California instead of his sexual escapades. That is more embarrassing!

  2. $26,000? On what grounds does Black have a basis to sue? So he was disinvited. Tough. Dustin Lance Black, you have a responsibility to give that money back! I hold you responsible for stealing taxpayer’s money.

    Had the board made Black’s intent to sue public, I am sure an outraged community would have embarrassed him for this immaturity. I hold the board responsible for cowardice.

    1. The cowardice was in disinviting him in the first place on a especially flimsy (and possibly homophobic) pretext.

      The bigger problem here is the under-the-table deal being made. These are taxpayer dollars we’re talking about here. You can’t just throw them around willy-nilly. There need to be public meetings, discussion, and announcement of any such payout. But again, the BOT proves itself less than transparent and in violation of the law.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.