Categorized | News, Top Story

Rocha receives more than $400,000 in severance pay

Share Button

President Mark Rocha will receive $403,826, plus up to $16,000 in “reasonable” legal expenses from the District, according to a severance package agreement released by the college.

“The terms of the severance package are in the best interests of all parties,” Board President Anthony Fellow said in the prepared statement. “Despite challenges and concerns that Dr. Rocha faced from various College constituents groups, with the support of the Board, he continued in his mission to improve the College.”

Fellow wasn’t sure if the $400,000 severance expenditure will affect the function of the school.

“No I don’t think, I don’t believe so,” Fellow said in a telephone interview with the Courier.

The college announced Rocha’s retirement Aug.7 and will take effect Aug. 31. However, the agreement released by the college also states that Rocha resigned and will get his regular salary through the end of August.

“Dr. Rocha hereby resigns as an employee of the District, effective August 31, 2014,” the agreement reads. “Dr. Rocha will receive his regular salary through the end of August, which means he will receive a regular paycheck on August 1, 2014, for July’s work and a regular paycheck on September 1, 2014, for August. The parties agree that Dr. Rocha’s resignation is irrevocable immediately upon executions of this Agreement.”

Rocha’s last official working day was July 31, according to the agreement. His severance payment equals to 18 months of his regular monthly salary.

Academic Senate President Eduardo Cairo wondered where the money for the severance package was coming from.

“The college would say there’s no money for X, Y and Z, but suddenly there’s money to pay this individual,” Cairo said. “I disagree to paying someone so much money for having done so much damaged to this institution. He received three no confidence votes and created a climate of fear on campus. He’s gone, but his policies are still in place causing problems on campus.”

Cairo also didn’t understand why Rocha was getting money for attorney fees.

“Why is the college on the hook for his legal expenses and why would he need an attorney if he’s retiring?” asked Cairo. “I never heard of such a thing.”

Rocha did not respond to several phone calls, texts messages and emails requesting comment on this story.

Board member Bill Thomson had a different take on the agreement between the District and Rocha.

“The severance package is not going to have an impact on the college’s ability to offer classes or provide teachers,” Thomson said. “I would urge people to keep both issues separate.”

Thomson would not comment on whether a vote was ever officially taken by the Board on Rocha’s severance package.

“I’m not at liberty to get into things like that,” Thomson said. “It was obviously discussed and approved by the Board and that’s about as much as I can comment on that.”

Board member Ross Selvidge was also reluctant to discuss the Board’s vote on the agreement.

“Any comment about the vote on the severance package I must refer you to Dr. Fellow,” Selvidge said.

Fellow told the Courier that he believes there was a vote, but he was out of town when it was taken.

“Yes [there was a vote taken] that’s what I understand, but I was away in Europe,” Fellow said.

Several local media organizations took the college’s General Counsel Gail Cooper to task publicly after she responded to several public records request and said there was no severance package “in effect.”

According to the agreement, Rocha had seven days to revoke the agreement following its execution. After the seven days expired, the public records requests were than honored by the General Counsel’s Office.

“The seven day period…is a mandatory period under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act when the agreement can be revoked and is therefore not yet effective,” Cooper said in an email.

The agreement isn’t clear as to its date of execution. Rocha signed the agreement on Aug. 4 and Fellow on Aug. 7. The deal also included a letter of recommendation from Fellow.

Share Button

11 Responses to “Rocha receives more than $400,000 in severance pay”

  1. nick says:

    I think Rocha is legal to get 400k, because Fellow and Rocha, they had a deal letter.

  2. Pay 400K says:

    Rocha he got 400K in 18month?? Is he really doing a good job in school??

  3. You complain about pay????? says:

    PCC Salaries for 2011

    William Foster, Instructor- $196,050
    Julie Kiotas, Instructor – $174,679
    John Sepikas, Instructor – $167,630
    Jia Shi – $165,200
    Lauren Arenson-$162,471
    Claudia Van Corva – $158,251
    Daniel Hamman – $155,943
    Frank Russel – $$154,199
    Amy Ulmer, Dean – $155,317
    Daniel Meier – $153,838
    Donald Gallon – $151,386

    http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/general-news/20120225/pcc-releases-salary-data-faculty-raked-in-4-million-in-overtime-in-2011

    • Potential Target says:

      Rocha gets over $400K for doing nothing; faculty makes less then half of that for working double-time. So the problem is…?

  4. Never Forget says:

    Ahhh, but let us never forget how faculty absconded with a cool $4 million in 2011:

    http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/general-news/20120225/pcc-releases-salary-data-faculty-raked-in-4-million-in-overtime-in-2011

    • nonymous says:

      What a red-herring illogical argument to make – what in the world do professors who teach an extra class or two to students who are trying to transfer and complete their educational goals have anything to do with the fact that the Board chooses one poor-performing president after another, and then pays them handsomely on their way out http://www.pasadenaweekly.com/cms/story/detail/way_too_much/13475/ leaving the professors, students and managers to pick up the pieces of their mess to restore the school’s reputation?

    • Potential Target says:

      Working overtime = stealing? What planet do you come from?

  5. pcc'er says:

    Shame on the board.

  6. Lalo says:

    The agreement is in effect as soon as the board takes a vote. The board broke the law.

  7. Potential Target says:

    I’m glad to see him gone, but 18 months’ pay?!? And legal fees on top of that? The latter in particular is galling, as our Board seems to be admitting that Rocha was in the wrong–if so, why not fire him for cause and not give him another 400K?

    • disgusted faculty member says:

      Amen. And don’t forget that Rocha was scarcely working at PCC after commencement. Part of that time, his check may have been accumulated vacation pay, but it seems probable that he was given another two or three months of pay while all he did was job hunt and negotiate terms for his resignation.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Comment


− 6 = 3